# Understanding the Difference: Hybrid Cloud Mesh vs Service Mesh
**Summary:**
Hybrid Cloud Mesh, now widely accessible, is transforming application connectivity across hybrid multicloud environments. This article aims to compare Hybrid Cloud Mesh with a typical service mesh to comprehend the intricacies of these fundamental components in modern enterprise connectivity.
Before diving into the comparison, let’s revisit the concept of Hybrid Cloud Mesh and a typical service mesh. Hybrid Cloud Mesh is a contemporary application-centric connectivity solution that creates a secure network overlay for applications distributed across cloud, edge, and on-prem, addressing the challenges posed by distribution of services across hybrid multicloud. On the other hand, a service mesh is an infrastructure layer managing all connectivity requirements between microservices, focusing on service-to-service communication.
### Hybrid Cloud Mesh vs Service Mesh: A Comparative Analysis
**1. Scope of connectivity**
– Hybrid Cloud Mesh goes beyond microservices within a containerized application, extending connectivity to applications across on-premises, public cloud, and private cloud infrastructure.
– Service mesh primarily focuses on managing communication between microservices within a containerized environment, with some expansion towards multi-cluster connectivity.
(For detailed comparative analysis, please refer to the original article above.)
**FAQ**
**Q: Does Hybrid Cloud Mesh support multicloud connectivity?**
A: Yes, Hybrid Cloud Mesh seamlessly connects applications across hybrid multicloud environments, offering a unified solution for organizations with diverse cloud infrastructures.
**Q: What is the scope of connectivity with Service Mesh?**
A: Service mesh is primarily designed for applications deployed within a specific cloud or on-premises environment, with some extension towards multicloud connectivity. However, it is not fully optimized for multicloud environments.
**Q: How does Hybrid Cloud Mesh handle dynamic network maintenance?**
A: It automatically adapts to dynamic changes in workload placement or environment, enabling resilient and reliable connectivity at scale without manual intervention.
**Q: What is the overhead associated with Service Mesh?**
A: There is significant overhead due to the sidecar proxy architecture which requires one sidecar-proxy for every workload, making it resource-intensive.
Always consult with your IT department or a professional for specific implementation and integration needs.